fbpx Buy Diazepam 10Mg Online Uk Order Xanax Europe Order Diazepam From China Buy Diazepam Tablets 10Mg

Get 15% off on your first assignment order and best assignment writing service for HND AssignmentsOrder Now

Have Any Question?

UK +4474648-84564

Free Support

hndassignmenthelp@gmail.com

HSC404 Qualification Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care

0 Comments

QUALIFI ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT

QualificationQualification Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care
Qualification No (RQF) Unit Name Unit Reference   No of Credits601/5058/0
Reflective Practice
HSC404
20 Credits

Prior to attempting this coursework assignment, Learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:

  • Centre Specification

o Can be found at https://qualifi.net/qualifi-level-3-diploma-in-business-management/

  • Qualifi Quality Assurance Standards
  • Qualifi Quality Policy Statement

Plagiarism and Collusion

In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.

Your accredited study center will direct you to the appropriate software that checks the level of similarity. Qualify recommends the use of www.punjabassignmenthelp.com as a part of the assessment.

Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.

Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence

Please familiarise yourself on Qualifi’s Malpractice and Maladministration policy, where you can find further information

Referencing

A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.

The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.

Qualifi recommends using Harvard Style of Referencing throughout your work.

Appendices

You may include appendices to support your work, however appendices must only contain additional supporting information, and must be clearly referenced in your assignment.

You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt chart and flowcharts that support the main report should be incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted.

Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, in accordance of Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.

Confidentiality

Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion.

Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.

Word Count Policy

Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices and information contained within references and bibliographies.

When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.

Submission of Assignments

All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre’s advice.

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file), or via Turnitin, where applicable.

This should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy posted to the Centre Manager (if required)

Marking and grades

Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.

Assignment Question

Task 1 – 500 words

Identify and explain models of reflection used in health and social care.

  1. : Identify two models of reflection commonly used in health and social care practice.
  1. : Explain the benefits to health and social care practitioners of reflective practice.

Assessment Criteria

  1. : Identify 2 models of reflection commonly used in health and social care practice.
  1. : Explain the benefits of reflective practice in health and social care.

Task 2 – 900 words

Develop the skills and knowledge required to plan for your personal and professional development.

  • : Discuss how personal development plans are used in health and social care practice.
  • : Develop a personal development plan:
    • Establish your purpose or direction
    • Identify development needs
    • Identify learning opportunities
    • Formulate an action plan
    • Undertake the development
    • Record the outcomes
    • Evaluate and review

Assessment Criteria

  • : Demonstrate an understanding of the use of personal development plans.
  • : Discuss how personal development plans are used in health and social care practice.
  • : Explain the role of clinical supervision in health and social care.
  • : Develop a personal development plan.
  • : Identify on the plan your aims, how to achieve, success criteria and how you will monitor if achieved.

Task 3 – 600 words

Discuss the links between theory and practice and how this can be facilitated.

  • : Discuss how to facilitate the use of research in practice.
  • What are its benefits?
    • What are the potential barriers to implementation of research into practice?

Assessment Criteria

  1. : Discuss how to facilitate the use of research in practice and its benefits.
  • : Discuss the potential barriers to implementation of research into practice.
 DistinguishedExcellentGoodProficientBasicMarginalUnacceptable
Criteria80+70605040300
    Content (alignment with assessment criteria)  Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking  Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinkingAdequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking  Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinkingDescribes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking  Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking  Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic
    Application of Theory and LiteratureIn-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept  Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts  Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts  Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts  Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently  Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support  Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature
    Knowledge and Understanding  Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and conceptsComprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts  Sound understanding of principles and concepts  Basic Knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principlesLimited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principlesConfused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles  Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles
      Presentation and Writing SkillsLogical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding expectations at this level; free from errors in mechanics and syntax  Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating mastery; free from errors in mechanics and syntax  Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and syntax which do not prohibit meaning    Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax  Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning  Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often interfere with meaning  Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning
  Referencing  Advanced use of in-text citation and references  Mastery of in-text citation and referencing  Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing  Adequate use of in-text citation and referencing  Limited use of in-text citation and referencing  Inadequate use of citation and referencingLittle or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources

Directions:

  1. For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
  • Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
  • To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at final mark.

Example:

 DistinguishedExcellentGoodProficientBasicMarginalUnacceptable
Range80-10070-7960-6950-5940-4935-390-34
CriteriaScore
Content50
Application of Theory and Literature40
Knowledge and Understanding50
Presentation/Writing Skills40
Referencing40
Total Score220/5 = 44, Basic

HEAD OFFICE

7 Acorn Business Park Commercial Gate, Nottingham Nottinghamshire

NG18 1EX

LONDON OFFICE

Golden Cross House

8 Duncannon Street, London WC2N 4JF