fbpx Buy Xanax From Europe Buy Xanax Pills Buy Soma Online 500Mg Order Valium Online Canada Order Alprazolam Powder Buy Valium 10 Mg Online

Get 15% off on your first assignment order and best assignment writing service for HND AssignmentsOrder Now

Have Any Question?

UK +4474648-84564

Free Support

hndassignmenthelp@gmail.com

HSC405 Qualifi Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care

0 Comments

QUALIFI ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT

QualificationQualifi Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care
Qualification No (RQF) Unit Name Unit Reference   No of Credits601/5058/0
Managing People in Health and Social Care
HSC405
20 Credits

Introduction

Prior to attempting this coursework assignment, Learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:

  • Centre Specification

o Can be found at https://qualifi.net/qualifi-level-3-diploma-in-business-management/

  • Qualifi Quality Assurance Standards
  • Qualifi Quality Policy Statement

Plagiarism and Collusion

In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.

Your accredited study centre will direct you to the appropriate software that checks the level of similarity. Qualifi recommends the use of https://www.turnitin.com as a part of the assessment.

Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.

Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence

Please familiarise yourself on Qualifi’s Malpractice and Maladministration policy, where you can find further information

Referencing

A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.

The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.

Qualifi recommends using Harvard Style of Referencing throughout your work.

Appendices

You may include appendices to support your work, however appendices must only contain additional supporting information, and must be clearly referenced in your assignment.

You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt chart and flowcharts that support the main report should be incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted.

Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, in accordance of Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.

Confidentiality

Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion.

Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.

Word Count Policy

Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices and information contained within references and bibliographies.

When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.

Submission of Assignments

All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre’s advice.

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file), or via Turnitin, where applicable.

This should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy posted to the Centre Manager (if required)

Marking and grades

Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.

Assignment Question

Task 1 – 500 words

Evaluate the processes for recruiting individuals to work in health and social care.

  1. : What are the factors involved in planning for recruitment?
  1. : How does legislation and policy impact on the recruitment process?

Assessment Criteria

  1. : Evaluate the factors involved in planning for recruitment.
  1. : Evaluate the recruitment process with links to legislation and policy.

Task 2 – 750 words

Explain the systems for monitoring and promoting the development of teams working in health and social care.

  • : Discuss the different types of teams found in health and social care.
  • : Explain the process of team development.
  • : Explain the role of appraisal in developing team members.

Assessment Criteria

  • : Explain the process of team development.
  • : Discuss different types of teams found in Health and social care.
  • : Explain the role of appraisal in developing team members.

Task 3 – 750 words

Analyse the process of change management and how to implement change successfully.

3.1: Discuss factors that drive change in a health and social care organisation. 3.2: Analyse two models of change commonly used in health and social care. 3.3: Analyse potential barriers to change and how to overcome them.

Assessment Criteria

3.1: Discuss factors that drive change in a health and social care organisation. 3.2: Analyse two models of change commonly used in health and social care. 3.3: Analyse potential barriers to change and how to overcome them.

 DistinguishedExcellentGoodProficientBasicMarginalUnacceptable
Criteria80+70605040300
    Content (alignment with assessment criteria)  Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking  Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinkingAdequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking  Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinkingDescribes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking  Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking  Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic
    Application of Theory and LiteratureIn-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept  Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts  Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts  Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts  Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently  Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support  Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature
    Knowledge and Understanding  Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and conceptsComprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts  Sound understanding of principles and concepts  Basic Knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principlesLimited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principlesConfused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles  Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles
      Presentation and Writing SkillsLogical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding expectations at this level; free from errors in mechanics and syntax  Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating mastery; free from errors in mechanics and syntax  Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and syntax which do not prohibit meaning    Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax  Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning  Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often interfere with meaning  Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning
  Referencing  Advanced use of in-text citation and references  Mastery of in-text citation and referencing  Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing  Adequate use of in-text citation and referencing  Limited use of in-text citation and referencing  Inadequate use of citation and referencingLittle or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources

Directions:

  1. For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
  • Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
  • To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at final mark.

Example:

 DistinguishedExcellentGoodProficientBasicMarginalUnacceptable
Range80-10070-7960-6950-5940-4935-390-34
CriteriaScore
Content50
Application of Theory and Literature40
Knowledge and Understanding50
Presentation/Writing Skills40
Referencing40
Total Score220/5 = 44, Basic

HEAD OFFICE

7 Acorn Business Park Commercial Gate, Nottingham Nottinghamshire

NG18 1EX

LONDON OFFICE

Golden Cross House

8 Duncannon Street, London WC2N 4JF

Copyright 2019 Qualifi Ltd

QUALIFI ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT

QualificationQualifi Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care
Qualification No (RQF) Unit Name Unit Reference   No of Credits601/5058/0
Managing People in Health and Social Care
HSC405
20 Credits

Prior to attempting this coursework assignment, Learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:

  • Centre Specification

o Can be found at https://qualifi.net/qualifi-level-3-diploma-in-business-management/

  • Qualifi Quality Assurance Standards
  • Qualifi Quality Policy Statement

Plagiarism and Collusion

In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.

Your accredited study centre will direct you to the appropriate software that checks the level of similarity. Qualifi recommends the use of as a part of the assessment.

Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.

Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence

Please familiarise yourself on Qualifi’s Malpractice and Maladministration policy, where you can find further information

A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.

The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.

Appendices

Qualifi recommends using Harvard Style of Referencing throughout your work.

You may include appendices to support your work, however appendices must only contain additional supporting information, and must be clearly referenced in your assignment.

You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt chart and flowcharts that support the main report should be incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted.

Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, in accordance of Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.

Confidentiality

Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion.

Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.Word Count Policy

Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices and information contained within references and bibliographies.

When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.

Submission of Assignments

All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre’s advice.

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file), or via Turnitin, where applicable.

This should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy posted to the Centre Manager (if required)

Marking and grades

Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.

Assignment Question

Task 1 – 500 words

Evaluate the processes for recruiting individuals to work in health and social care.

  1. : What are the factors involved in planning for recruitment?
  1. : How does legislation and policy impact on the recruitment process?

Assessment Criteria

  1. : Evaluate the factors involved in planning for recruitment.
  1. : Evaluate the recruitment process with links to legislation and policy.

Task 2 – 750 words

Explain the systems for monitoring and promoting the development of teams working in health and social care.

  • : Discuss the different types of teams found in health and social care.
  • : Explain the process of team development.
  • : Explain the role of appraisal in developing team members.

Assessment Criteria

  • : Explain the process of team development.
  • : Discuss different types of teams found in Health and social care.
  • : Explain the role of appraisal in developing team members.

Task 3 – 750 words

Analyse the process of change management and how to implement change successfully.

3.1: Discuss factors that drive change in a health and social care organisation. 3.2: Analyse two models of change commonly used in health and social care. 3.3: Analyse potential barriers to change and how to overcome them.

Assessment Criteria

3.1: Discuss factors that drive change in a health and social care organisation. 3.2: Analyse two models of change commonly used in health and social care. 3.3: Analyse potential barriers to change and how to overcome them.

 DistinguishedExcellentGoodProficientBasicMarginalUnacceptable
Criteria80+70605040300
    Content (alignment with assessment criteria)  Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking  Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinkingAdequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking  Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinkingDescribes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking  Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking  Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic
    Application of Theory and LiteratureIn-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept  Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts  Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts  Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts  Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently  Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support  Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature
    Knowledge and Understanding  Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and conceptsComprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts  Sound understanding of principles and concepts  Basic Knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principlesLimited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principlesConfused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles  Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles
      Presentation and Writing SkillsLogical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding expectations at this level; free from errors in mechanics and syntax  Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating mastery; free from errors in mechanics and syntax  Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and syntax which do not prohibit meaning    Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax  Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning  Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often interfere with meaning  Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning
  Referencing  Advanced use of in-text citation and references  Mastery of in-text citation and referencing  Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing  Adequate use of in-text citation and referencing  Limited use of in-text citation and referencing  Inadequate use of citation and referencingLittle or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources

Directions:

  1. For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
  • Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
  • To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at final mark.

Example:

 DistinguishedExcellentGoodProficientBasicMarginalUnacceptable
Range80-10070-7960-6950-5940-4935-390-34
CriteriaScore
Content50
Application of Theory and Literature40
Knowledge and Understanding50
Presentation/Writing Skills40
Referencing40
Total Score220/5 = 44, Basic

HEAD OFFICE

7 Acorn Business Park Commercial Gate, Nottingham Nottinghamshire

NG18 1EX

LONDON OFFICE

Golden Cross House

8 Duncannon Street, London WC2N 4JF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *