fbpx Buy Alprazolam Mexico Buy Valium Next Day Uk Buy Alprazolam Tablets Buy Xanax 2Mg India Buy Valium London Uk Buy Xanax Valium Online

Get 15% off on your first assignment order and best assignment writing service for HND AssignmentsOrder Now

Have Any Question?

UK +4474648-84564

Free Support

hndassignmenthelp@gmail.com

MKT10007 Fundamentals of Marketing

0 Comments

Text Box: Semester 1, 2022

MKT10007 Fundamentals of Marketing

Assignment 3 

Teamwork Submission Document

Submission of the Team Submission Document form One Group member only will submit the Team Submission Document to Turnitin. ·         Attach to the Team Submission Document your Presentation slides. Use Google Chrome browser when uploading. Other team members are not required to submit anything to Turnitin. Fundamentals of Marketing

  The Group’s Assessment of the Group’s Performance – The Group will complete this Form.  You will read “What makes a Good Team Member” and “The Group’s Assessment of the Group’s Performance” Rubric on the next page. Then you will mark (with a cross) the squares below to show which ones best describe your Group’s performance. Then, please answer the Questions on this page. NOTE: Teamwork is worth 5% of your final mark for Assignment 3. Your mark will be based on BOTH the marker’s assessment of the Assignment’s quality* overall PLUS your Group’s self-assessment. Please refer to the Task Rubric for further explanation. (*This includes how well the various Group members’ parts link together to make a Presentation that flows from one point to the next, making a persuasive presentation.)
ComponentNot yet CompleteCompetentSophisticated
Teamwork   
How well the Group resolved any issues regarding the contributions of individual Group members.   
The Group’s evaluation of the Assignment we produced.   
How well the Group thinks we demonstrated our subject knowledge.   
Evidence   
Presentation and referencing   
3. Answer these questions; What worked well this time? What did not work so well this time? What will you do differently next time? Anything else? Would you as a Group like to meet your Tutor to discuss this further? INSERT Additional page(s) as needed.                                

The Group’s Assessment of the Group’s Performance – Rubric (Adapted from “Grading Rubric for a Group Project”, Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence, Carnegie-Mellon University, accessed January 2016.)
ComponentNot yet CompleteCompetentSophisticated
TeamworkTeam did not collaborate or communicate well. Some members would work independently, without regard to objectives or priorities. A lack of respect and regard for others was frequently noted.The team worked well together most of the time, with only a few occurrences of communication breakdown or failure to collaborate. Members were mostly respectful of each other.The team worked well together to achieve objectives. Each member contributed in a valuable way to the Assignment. All members demonstrated a high level of mutual respect and collaboration.
How the Group resolved any issues regarding the contributions of individual Group members.Communication did not always identify any issues at the appropriate time. Communication was often not respectful. Expectations were often not made clear to the Group member in a way they understood regarding the tasks and deadlines. The member concerned then either did not make a commitment and/or failed to deliver accordingly. Other Group members did not help the member concerned. The Group now has an atmosphere of lack of lack-of-mutual-respect.Communication identified any issues at the appropriate time. Communication was mostly respectful. Expectations were usually made clear to the Group member concerned in a way they understood regarding the tasks and deadlines. The member concerned then made a commitment and for the most part delivered accordingly. Sometimes other Group members helped the member to deliver. The Group thereby maintained an atmosphere which was mostly respectful.Respectful communication identified any issues at the appropriate time. Expectations were made clear to the Group member concerned in a way they understood regarding the tasks and deadlines. The member concerned then made a commitment and delivered accordingly. Whenever needed, other Group members helped the member to deliver. The Group thereby maintained an atmosphere of mutual respect.
The Group’s evaluation of the Assignment we produced.The Assignment does not meet all the requirements and objectives. Consequently, it does not demonstrate an insightful understanding of the CDMP for our selected product.Most requirements and objectives of the Assignment were successfully identified and delivered. The Assignment demonstrates a reasonably insightful understanding of the CDMP for our selected product.All requirements and objectives of the Assignment were successfully identified and delivered. The Assignment demonstrates an insightful understanding of the CDMP for our selected product.
How well the Group thinks they demonstrated their subject knowledge.The Assignment does not demonstrate substantial knowledge of the CDMP content. Nor does it demonstrate any depth of thinking about the CDMP.The Assignment demonstrates knowledge of the CDMP content and shows some integrating of major and minor concepts. It shows some  thinking about the CDMP and some insightful understanding.The Assignment demonstrates knowledge of the CDMP content by integrating major and minor concepts. It shows a depth of thinking about, and an insightful understanding of the CDMP.
EvidenceThe Assignment does not demonstrate evidence of extensive research effortThe Assignment demonstrates a reasonable amount of evidence of research effort.The Assignment demonstrates evidence of extensive research effort.
Presentation and referencingPresentation and referencing fail to meet the Pass requirements of the Assignment’s Rubric.Presentation and referencing meet the Pass or Credit requirements of the Assignment’s Rubric.Meet the D or HD requirements of the Assignment’s Rubric in these areas.

What makes a good Group member? Read the Rubric below here and discuss it with your Group. Commit that you will all be “Excellent” Group members.Fundamentals of Marketing

Criterion1 – Unsatisfactory2 – Below average3 – Average4 – Above-average5 – Excellent
Knowledge of subject at start or acquired during. Unsatisfactory or no knowledge and skills relevant. Did not acquire them during the Assignment.Below average knowledge and skills relevant to the assignment.Average knowledge and skills relevant to the assignment.Above-average knowledge and skills relevant to the assignmentComprehensive knowledge and skills relevant to the assignment.
Timeliness of delivery of assigned tasks.Failed to meet deadlines, no initiative, unwilling, never volunteered.Sometimes missed deadlines, no initiative beyond assigned tasks, never volunteered.Regularly met deadlines, some initiative, never volunteered for additional tasks.Always met deadlines, good initiative, sometimes volunteered for additional tasks.Always met deadlines, excellent initiative, volunteered for additional tasks.
Participation as a Group member.Behaviour is detrimental to group. Feedback it provided was usually not constructive, failed to maturely use feedback received. Was either unaware of expected roles or rarely or never met them. Rarely or never listen to the ideas of others. Often did not treat others respectfully. Never supported othersBehaviour is inconsistent and occasionally distracts group meetings. Occasionally constructive feedback to others and occasionally mature use of feedback. Rarely met expected roles as needed in the circumstances. Sometimes this in carefully to the ideas of others. Sometimes did not treat others respectfully. Rarely supported othersRegularly demonstrates appropriate team behaviour; building rapport, teamwork, collaborative work practices, facilitated learning. Sometimes constructive feedback to others – sometimes mature use of feedback. Sometimes met expected roles as needed in the circumstances. Usually listened carefully to ideas of others. Usually treated others respectfully. Sometimes gave  more support to others than expectedConsistently demonstrates appropriate team behaviour; building rapport, teamwork, collaborative work practices, facilitated learning. Constructive feedback to others – generally mature use of feedback received. Usually met expected roles as needed in the circumstances. Almost always listen carefully to the ideas of others. Almost always treated others respectfully. Usually gave more task support to others than expectedConsistently demonstrated exemplary team behaviour; building rapport, teamwork, collaborative work practices, facilitated learning. Extremely constructive feedback to others – mature use of feedback. Met expected roles of Follower, Leader, and Contributor as needed in the circumstances. Always listened carefully to ideas of others. Always treated other members respectfully. Gave more task support to others than expected.
Attended % of meetings on time.Did not attend1%-32%33%-65%66%-99%100%
Quality of contributionPoor/little understanding of purpose & objectives, cite & ref. No analysis & synthesis, assessment criteria met.Below average understanding of purpose & objectives, cite & ref, sophisticated analysis & synthesis, assessment criteria met.Average understanding of purpose & objectives, cite & ref, sophisticated analysis & synthesis, assessment criteria met.Above average understanding of purpose & objectives, cite & ref, sophisticated analysis & synthesis, assessment criteria met.Thorough understanding of purpose & objectives, citation & ref, sophisticated analysis & synthesis, assessment criteria met.